Denver is a better place to live than Chicago

-
  1. ine, lower humidity, and winters that feel milder despite similar temperatures.
  2. Denver provides easier access to outdoor recreation - Rocky Mountains for skiing, hiking, camping, climbing, and mountain biking within an hour.
  3. Denver has better air quality than Chicago due to less industrial pollution and lower population density.
  4. Downtown Denver offers abundant, affordable parking compared to Chicago's expensive and limited options.
  5. Denver's light rail system has expanded significantly, providing good public transportation alternatives.

❌ Top Reasons to Disagree

  1. Housing costs in Denver have skyrocketed - the market may be in a bubble, with home prices and rents becoming unaffordable for average workers.
  2. Chicago offers vastly superior cultural amenities - world-class museums (Art Institute, Field Museum, Shedd Aquarium), architecture, theater district, and music venues.
  3. Denver's downtown feels less safe than Chicago's Loop - visible homelessness and public drug use near shelters in the city center make women and families uncomfortable, especially at night.
  4. Denver's street layout is confusing - the grid doesn't align consistently, mixing diagonal streets following the river with standard north-south orientation.
  5. Denver's restrictive zoning artificially inflates housing costs and forces sprawl, creating longer commutes and more pollution than necessary.
  6. Denver residents exhibit provincial self-righteousness - bumper stickers saying "Native," reverential attitudes toward local sports teams, and assumptions that their city is uniquely superior.

Each reason is a belief with its own page of pros/cons, counterarguments, and rebuttals. Each argument is scored by the truth, linkage, and importance of their linked pro/con sub-arguments.

⚖️ Core Value Conflict

Supporting Values

Advertised:

  1. Quality of life through outdoor access and natural beauty
  2. Health and wellness - active lifestyle enabled by climate and geography
  3. Work-life balance in a smaller, more manageable city
  4. Environmental consciousness and clean air

Actual:

  1. Preference for suburban/car-oriented western lifestyle over dense urban living
  2. Prioritizing recreation over cultural depth
  3. Acceptance of higher housing costs in exchange for mountain access

Opposing Values

Advertised:

  1. Cultural sophistication and world-class urban amenities
  2. True urban diversity and cosmopolitan experience
  3. Economic opportunity in a major financial/business center
  4. Public transit and walkability over car dependence

Actual:

  1. Appreciation for density, architecture, and established urban infrastructure
  2. Preference for deep cultural institutions over outdoor recreation
  3. Great Lakes water access matters as much as mountain access

Advertised values are what supporters and opponents claim motivates their position. Actual values are what evidence suggests truly drives them, based on their actions rather than stated reasons.

💡 Interests & Motivations

Supporters

  1. Outdoor enthusiasts - skiers, climbers, hikers, mountain bikers who prioritize weekend recreation
  2. People seeking sunshine and lower humidity for health or preference reasons
  3. Those with family connections to the Rocky Mountain region
  4. Workers in Denver's tech and aerospace sectors who need to live near employment
  5. Those fleeing Midwest winters or seeking a "western" lifestyle

Opponents

  1. Cultural professionals - artists, academics, museum workers who depend on major institutions
  2. People who prioritize walkable urban density over suburban sprawl
  3. Those with established careers in Chicago's larger economy
  4. Fans of Great Lakes recreation - sailing, fishing, beach access
  5. People concerned about Denver's housing affordability crisis

Understanding interests and motivations is essential for conflict resolution. We must identify what each side truly wants and needs to develop solutions that address underlying concerns rather than surface positions.

🔗 Shared vs. Conflicting Interests

Shared Interests

  1. Both cities offer access to significant natural/water features (mountains vs. Great Lakes)
  2. Both provide strong job markets in different sectors
  3. Both have growing food and craft beer scenes
  4. Both offer professional sports teams and urban amenities

Conflicting Interests

  1. Denver prioritizes outdoor recreation access; Chicago prioritizes cultural institution depth
  2. Denver accepts sprawl and car dependence; Chicago maintains walkable density
  3. Denver's climate appeals to some; Chicago's true four seasons appeal to others
  4. Denver's smaller scale feels manageable; Chicago's major-city scale provides more opportunity

📜 Foundational Assumptions

Required to Accept This Belief

  1. Access to outdoor recreation is more valuable than access to world-class cultural institutions
  2. Climate and sunshine have significant impact on quality of life and are worth prioritizing
  3. A smaller, more manageable city is preferable to a major metropolitan center
  4. Proximity to family (for this particular person, in Boise) matters more than other factors

Required to Reject This Belief

  1. Cultural depth, architecture, and urban sophistication are more valuable than mountain access
  2. True urban density and walkability are superior to car-dependent sprawl
  3. Major economic opportunities in finance, law, and corporate headquarters matter more than tech/aerospace jobs
  4. Great Lakes water access provides equivalent recreational value to mountain access

These assumptions highlight foundational disagreements - what each side must assume to defend their view.

🔄 Similar Beliefs

Stronger Versions

  1. Denver is the best city to live in the United States
  2. Mountain access makes any Rocky Mountain city superior to any Midwest or coastal city

Weaker Versions

  1. Denver is a better fit for outdoor enthusiasts specifically, but Chicago is better overall
  2. Denver and Chicago are both good cities with different strengths for different people

Grouping similar belief statements prevents fragmented debates and ensures comprehensive analysis.

🔬 Evidence & Objectivity

🧪 Top Objective Criteria

  1. Days of sunshine per year (measurable climate data)
  2. Cost of living / housing affordability relative to median income
  3. Number and quality of cultural institutions (museums, theaters, concert halls)
  4. Crime rates and public safety statistics
  5. Access time to recreational amenities (mountains, lakes, parks)
  6. Public transportation coverage and ridership

Measurable standards for evaluating this belief objectively, independent of personal values or preferences.

📂 Evidence Quality Assessment

Supporting Evidence

  1. Denver averages 300 days of sunshine annually vs. Chicago's 189 days
  2. Denver provides access to multiple ski resorts within 1-2 hours
  3. Denver's air quality index is generally better than Chicago's
  4. Forbes ranked Denver metro #5 for doing business

Opposing Evidence

  1. Chicago's median home price to income ratio is more favorable than Denver's (Denver housing costs have increased faster than wages)
  2. The Art Institute of Chicago ranks among the top 10 museums globally; Denver has no equivalent institutions
  3. Chicago's public transit serves 1.6 million daily riders; Denver's serves approximately 100,000
  4. Chicago's Loop is consistently rated as safer for pedestrians at night than downtown Denver near homeless service centers

📉 Cost-Benefit Analysis

📕 Potential Benefits of Choosing Denver

  1. More sunshine and lower humidity improve mood and enable year-round outdoor activity
  2. World-class skiing, hiking, and mountain recreation within an hour
  3. Cleaner air and generally better environmental quality
  4. Less confusing for drivers outside downtown (though downtown itself is confusing)
  5. Closer to family in Boise and other mountain west connections

📘 Potential Costs of Choosing Denver

  1. Significantly higher housing costs without proportional wage increases
  2. Lack of world-class cultural institutions - fewer museums, theaters, architectural landmarks
  3. Homeless service delivery model creates visible problems in downtown core, affecting women and families' sense of safety
  4. More car-dependent sprawl results in longer commutes and more pollution
  5. Provincial attitudes and "Native" bumper sticker culture can feel exclusionary to newcomers

🎯 Short vs. Long-Term Impacts

Short-Term

  1. Denver's sunshine immediately improves mood and enables outdoor activity
  2. Housing costs create immediate financial stress for renters and buyers
  3. Cultural limitations may not be felt immediately but become apparent over time

Long-Term

  1. Outdoor recreation access provides sustained quality-of-life benefits for active people
  2. Housing affordability crisis may force middle-class workers to leave or commute from distant suburbs
  3. Lack of deep cultural institutions limits long-term intellectual and artistic growth
  4. Denver's growth trajectory may make it more like the cities people moved here to escape

🤝 Intelligent Compromise Solutions

Solutions Addressing Core Concerns

  1. Personal circumstances matter most - neither city is objectively "better." Denver works for this person because of family proximity and outdoor recreation priorities. Chicago works for others with different values.
  2. Denver could address homelessness more effectively by decentralizing services away from the downtown core where families and workers need to feel safe.
  3. Denver should reform zoning to allow more housing construction, reducing costs and shortening commutes.
  4. Acknowledge trade-offs honestly - Denver residents should recognize Chicago's cultural superiority; Chicago residents should acknowledge Denver's climate and recreation advantages.

Evidence-based solutions that address the legitimate interests of both sides, derived from cost-benefit analysis and shared concerns.

🚧 Primary Obstacles to Resolution

Barriers to Supporter Honesty/Compromise

  1. Denver residents' provincial self-righteousness makes them defensive about the city's weaknesses
  2. Sunk costs - people who paid high prices for Denver homes have financial interest in believing they made the right choice
  3. Outdoor recreation is genuinely important to supporters, making other factors hard to weigh fairly

Barriers to Opposition Honesty/Compromise

  1. Chicago residents may dismiss outdoor recreation because they don't personally prioritize it
  2. Some people have never lived outside their home region and can't fairly compare
  3. Career investments in Chicago-specific industries make relocation impractical regardless of quality of life

Specific factors preventing each side from engaging honestly and finding mutually beneficial solutions.

🧠 Cognitive Biases

Affecting Supporters

  1. Confirmation bias - noticing sunshine and mountains while ignoring cultural limitations
  2. Choice-supportive bias - justifying the decision to move to Denver by exaggerating its benefits
  3. Availability heuristic - recent outdoor adventures feel more salient than absence of museums

Affecting Opponents

  1. Status quo bias - preferring Chicago simply because it's familiar
  2. Cultural superiority complex - dismissing outdoor recreation as less sophisticated than museum visits
  3. Sour grapes - Chicago residents may minimize mountain recreation because they can't access it easily

📚 Media Resources

📈 Supporting

Songs

  1. "Rocky Mountain High" by John Denver

Articles

  1. Forbes ranking Denver metro #5 for doing business

📉 Opposing

Articles

  1. Various analyses of Denver's housing affordability crisis
  2. Rankings of Chicago's cultural institutions

⚖️ Legal Framework

Supporting Laws

  1. Colorado's outdoor recreation economy protection statutes

Contradicting Laws

  1. Denver's restrictive zoning ordinances that limit housing supply and drive up costs

🧭 General to Specific Belief Mapping

🔹 Most General (Upstream)

Support

  1. Mountain cities provide better quality of life than Midwest cities

Oppose

  1. Major metropolitan centers provide better opportunities and experiences than mid-size mountain cities

🔹 More Specific (Downstream)

Support

  1. Denver specifically is better than Chicago specifically for people who prioritize outdoor recreation and family proximity to the mountain west

Oppose

  1. Chicago specifically offers cultural and economic opportunities that Denver cannot match

📬 Personal Note

For me personally, Denver is better than Chicago because it's closer to my family in Boise and my job brought me here. I recognize this doesn't make Denver objectively better - it makes it better for my specific circumstances.

I appreciate Denver but bristle at the "Native" bumper stickers and self-righteousness. Every city has strengths and weaknesses. Denver has mountains and sunshine. Chicago has museums and architecture. Both have value. Neither makes its residents superior to the other.

📬 Contact me to contribute to the Idea Stock Exchange.

      Comments

      Post a Comment

      Popular posts from this blog

      You should write the Life History of your Grandmothers Gwendolyn Higbee Matheson (Mom's Mom)

      -
      Image
      This is my mom's mom's life history. Also check out the ongoing projects for my   dad ,  mom , and   and  dad's mom .  Typed by Michael Laub, from a photocopy of the original that Gwendolyn typed on a typewriter. Comments by me in parenthesis Henry Gordon, Gwendolyn Higbee, And LaVane Matheson   It must have been a sad day when I was born. I was the fifth child in less than nine years, and arthritis had made mother ( Sarah Ann Jones ) a cripple long before that December 5, 1891. She was bed-fast most of the time until she died early in 1895 (10th of March) when I was a little over 3 yrs. old. Five little children had to be parceled out with relatives, and it fell to my lot to live with Grandmother Higbee. So you see I went to live in a large home that had already housed many children and where no more were to come. (click below to read more)
      Read more

      You should write your father's Life History

      -
      Image
      Best reasons to agree : +6 Its hard to understand yourself very well without trying to figure out parents. Your kids will want to know about their grandparents. If your kids become famous, biographers will want to know about your family.  Writing about your parents can be a fun activity that brings your family together. Its a good way to remember stuff.  A well rounded person can have fun, work hard, relax, and also find time to write about their experiences, or document what they are doing, or did.  You can't just do stuff all the time... you also have to reflect... going through the process of gathering stories, photos, and memories allows you to process, and look back... Best reasons to disagree : -1  Every time you spend doing one thing is time you can't spend doing something else.  Score: # of reasons to agree: +6 # of reasons to disagree: -1 # of reasons to agree with reasons to agree: +0 # of reasons to agree with reason...
      Read more

      The Art Institute of Chicago is Better than the Denver Museum of Art

      -
      Image
      Best reasons to agree : +1 The Art Institute of Chicago is bigger, and bigger museums are better. the second largest art museum in the United States, after the Metropolitan Museum of Art. The Art Institute of Chicago has over 260,000 works of art. You run out of things to see when going to the Denver art museum, because it doesn't change very often. Best reasons to disagree : -1 Its less expensive to stay and park in Denver, in 2012 parking was $28 in Chicago and $4 in Denver.  Images that agree : Coffin and Mummy of Paankhenamun, Third Intermediate Period, Dynasty 22 (c. 945–715 B.C.) Cartonnage, gold leaf, pigment; human remains Ancient Egyptian beliefs in the afterlife gave rise to the complex art and science of mummification. This vividly painted Mummy Case was the innermost of a series of shells that housed the body of a deceased person. The hieroglyphic inscriptions and painted scenes identify this mummy as Paankhenamun, a doorkeeper in th...
      Read more

      It is worth the effort that caring for animals takes in order to keep them part of our lives -0.5

      -
      Image
      Killer whales should not be kept in captivity. Reasons to agree : Over seas zoos are cooler, because they let you have more of an experience with animals Our pets put up with our kids playing with (tormenting) them. See video below for proof. Cats are good on a farm for killing mice. Dogs are good for scaring away possums  raccoon  and field mice.   No one's house needs to be so clean that they don't have animals.  Having animals can help you prepare for your death, and the deaths of those you love. Animals usually have a shorter life span than we do. We don't talk about death enough. It is true that the sun will burn out, and we are the only species that has a chance to escape this earth, but we will be lonely if we can't take any other species with us. Animals experience human emotions .  Reasons to agree :  Pets are a mess. Pets shed. Pets poop and pee in your house or in your yard. Pets ki...
      Read more

      Trampolines are not too dangerous and are good for kids +2

      -
      Image
      Reasons to agree : +7 Their is little risk of falling off a trampoline if you have netting. Trampolines are no more dangerous than football. Trampolines are perhaps no more dangerous than swimming pools, but they are much less expensive, and take less maintenance.  Trampolines with netting on the side are not too dangerous.  Kids jump on beds. You can't stop kids from jumping on stuff. Cars are dangerous, and we aren't going to stop driving cars are we? Obviously its not that simple. For instance, cars are more important than trampolines. But it is not required that you drive to unimportant places. Therefore, you can compare the danger and importance of driving to a park to jumping on the trampoline: both are recreational activities with some risk. The question is how much risk? How important is the activity? Obviously, a trampoline derives its importance as a form of recreation, and so you can't answer the question without first asking yourself ho...
      Read more

      My kids enjoy visits from their grandparents

      -
      Image
      Images that agree : Friday Morning Walk around the block.    Grandma didn't get as many hugs last time. She is very happy this time    Ali also likes her Grandpa.    Phis is doing better staying in his stroller. Stupid camera strap. Phil's shoes were wet from yesterday at the duck pond so he went for his walk in in PJs and shoe-less.
      Read more

      You should try to convince your kids to not use drugs

      -
      Image
      Best reasons to agree : +5 Drugs addiction will often kill you. Drugs addiction often causes people to live on the street.  Drugs will often cause you to steel from and lie to your family. Drugs will addict you. Addiction takes control of your life. It is bad to loose control of your life. In general most parents should tell their kids not to use drugs. Obviously there is a right and a wrong way to do it. You should wait until they are the right age, but not too long. If you are struggling with your kids, and they have no respect for you, perhaps you should find someone that they respect more.  Best reasons to disagree : -5 All kids will rebel to some degree against their parents. This is a natural process of finding yourself, and creating your own separate identity. By telling your kids not to use drugs this creates a situation when they will have a physiological or emotional reason to do the opposite.   Telling kids not to use drugs only...
      Read more

      You should get a membership to The Chicago Field Museum +0

      -
      Image
      Reasons to agree : 4 The Chicago Field Museum has Sue, the largest and most complete Tyrannosaurus skeleton currently known. A visit to a museum is not as educational as reading a book, but it is educational enough.  Not as educational as reading a book In order for something to be very educational something has to go into depth. Reading plaques in front of stuffed animals is not very in depth.  ... it is educational enough At a museum you get to brows a bunch of topic. I guess the goal is that you find something that is interesting, and then you can go somewhere else and learn more later. With no guided tour you can do whatever you want. You get out of it, like most life, what you put in. Perhaps instead of rushing from thing to thing, find a few things you are interested in and then really experience that thing. Perhaps bring a sketch pad and draw stuff. The Chicago Field Museum is a short walk from Northerly Island, which offers park...
      Read more

      Its alright to let your young kids chase geese +5

      -
      Image
      Reasons to agree : +7 Young kids will never catch geese. Geese can bight back. They have sharp teeth.  Geese are overpopulated. For instance here in Chicago they put chemicals on eggs to prevent them from hatching, because their are too many, and they poop everywhere and create environmental problems. The lack of predators have allowed geese to overpopulate.  If you eat meat you are guilty of more violence against animals than chasing geese.  Geese may get chased by wild animals. They are violent against each other. They rape ducks (google it, it is a fact). You can't apply people ethics to animals. Animals chase each other. Cats chase mice and play with them. If you don't want animals tormented you will have to kill all cats.  Its cool to watch birds fly. Letting kids chase birds until they fly gives kids an awe, and an experience, and an appreciation for animals. It is possible to love animals, and hunt them, as native Americans taught us. Chasing...
      Read more

      It is hard work but can be humorous teaching kids manners and hygiene

      -
      Image
      Best Videos that agree : +2   Best reasons to agree : + Kids eat things they should not eat.  Kids lick bird poop off sliding glass windows.  When you find brown stuff in their bed, and say it looks like poop, they just might tell you, "Don't worry, it doesn't taste like poop." When you ask why they tested it, they might say, "don't worry I didn't eat it, I just put my teeth on it". PS: it was, against all assurances, poop. We told her she needs to wash her hands, because she might get sick, she tells us, "I'm already sick" (she had a runny nose). Kids eat dirt. Kids eat rolly pollies (not ours, yet) Kids eat things that shouldn't be eaten, but won't eat anything you try to feed them.  It is funny seeing a little brain that has not yet learned that it is impolite to suck your toes in public... Score: # of reasons to agree: +3 # of reasons to disagree: -0 # of reasons to agree with re...
      Read more