Showing posts with label Transportation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Transportation. Show all posts

Chicago has good mass transportation +2

Assumptions:
  • Good means low cost, and high quality. Transportation includes parking. Not all transportation facilities are "public". For instance privately owned parking garages are part of the equation.
Reasons to agree:
  1. If you are lucky you can find parallel parking for free around Lincoln Park Zoo.
  2. Parking is $1.00 an hour, if you can find any, near Northerly Island. I drove there with 2 bikes in  my car, and my 7 year old son, and we rode to Millennium Park and back. 
  3. Kids ride the Metra free on the weekends. 
  4. The Water Tower Place Mall does parking validation. 
  5. It costs $7 per adult to ride to Chicago Union Station (week-end passes, kids ride free). From there you can walk to a number of places:
    1. Millennium Park. 
      1. In the summer, kids can play in the fountain. Bring towels, and a change of clothes. It is sort of white trash, but they can change in the bathrooms. 
      2. Each time you go down the kids will probably want to look at the bean, and get their photo taken.
      3. I should probably walk the whole park once. Their are some statues on the south end I have never seen. 
    2. Winter
      1. Kris Kringle Market Chicago 
    3. We walked, with 3 kids, and 2 strollers, all the way to the Hancock Building. It was a pretty long walk. When we got back to Navy Pear we took a water taxi bat to Union Station, to save our legs, and to make a train.
    Reasons to disagree:
    1. Sales tax is high in Chicago.
    2. It costs $20 at a minimum to park in Chicago. 
    3. It cost $7 for a weekend pass. So if you want to go in as a couple it costs $14 just to get there. 
    Score
    • Reasons to agree: +5
    • Reasons to agree: -3
    • Total: +2

    You can form emotional attachment to objects that transport you


    My son's puddle Line
    My son at the Bolingbrook High School Parking Lot
    My dad giving my son a ride. My dad loves himself some 4-wheeler,
    and knows Owyhee County like the back of his hand. 
    James and I, 2006ish, on Meg K's bike
    With some money that I was able to get from my job at Miner's RV, I bought my first car when I was 14. It was a 1986 ford escort, 2-door, hatch-back, with automatic seat-belts. I bought it from my dad for $500 dollar (photos of each car to follow later).

    Bike in the snake-swamp at Camp
    Morison in McCall
    At Bogus basin above Boise. I'm the one on the right. 
    After getting too many tickets, Al-State would no longer insure me. So I rode my bike to school a good portion of my Senior Year. Nothing says chick magnet like pulling up to school on a bicycle...
    My bike with random water-colors and ink
    My parents mailed my bike to me in Tennessee


    Video of Ali and James ridding a bike we got from the Chipmans
    James Chasing Finnley on his Tricycle 
    I "walked" for 2 years, ever other week in Tennessee on my Mission, and put lots of miles on my Dr. Martins
    My big wheel. Mine.
    Big Wheel and Banana Seat Bike

    Websites that agree:

    (+5) We should eliminate subsidies for the Amtrak




    Reasons to agree:


    1. It doesn't matter that more money is spent on roads, and air travel than amtrak, because more people travel these methods. The simple fact is that more is spent per mile traveled per person, with each dollar given to amtrak, vs. other methods of Government spending. 

    2. According to the United States Department of Transportation's Bureau of Transportation Statistics, rail and mass transit are considerably more subsidized on a per passenger-mile basis by the federal government than other forms of transportation; the subsidy varies year to year, but exceeds $100 dollars (in 2000 dollars) per thousand passenger-miles, compared to subsidies around $10 per thousand passenger-miles for aviation (with general aviation subsidized considerably more per passenger-mile than commercial aviation), subsidies around $4 per thousand passenger-miles for intercity buses, and automobiles being a small net contributor through the gas tax and other user fees rather than being subsidized. ("Federal Subsidies to Passenger Transportation". Bureau of Transportation Statistics. Retrieved June 13, 2009.)

    3. We shouldn't give money to amtrack just because we also give other forms of transportation. The question should be: can we live without funding Amtrak? If so, because we are so much in debt, we should get rid of it. The question of not spending any more money on the Federal Interstate Highway System, the Federal Aviation Administration, many airports, among many aspects of passenger aviation, is a separate question. 

    4. We should reward success and punish failure. 

    5. Amtrack is unprofitable

    6. We spend 1.6 billion a year on Amtrack. 

    7. Amtrak has proven incapable of operating as a business.

    8. Amtrak does not provide valuable transportation services meriting public support.

    9. Amtrak is a "mobile money-burning machine.

    10. The federal government shouldn't spend money on planes, trains, and automobiles. We should pick one, if we want to fund infrastructural. 

    11. Americans should support cars. They allow freedom. Giving money to train companies is sort of a socialist activity... We have to rely on someone else to get you there...










    1. The U.S. Department of Energy considers Amtrak among the most energy-efficient forms of transportation.

    2. If we are going to end subsidies to Amtrak we should also end subsidies to maintain roads, or support airline traffic. 

    3. Drunk drivers are less likely to kill you on a train. 

    4. As a matter of fairness Amtrak should only be expected to be as self-sufficient as the federal highway system. 

    5. As of 2008:


      1.  $10 billion per year was transferred from the general fund to the Highway Trust Fund.

      2. $2.7 billion is granted to the FAA

      3. $8 billion goes to "security and life safety for cruise ships


    6. Amtrak provides all of its own security, while airport security is a separate federal subsidy. 



























      # of reasons to agree: 11





      # of reasons to disagree: -6




      # of reasons to agree with reasons to agree: 0




      # of reasons to agree with reasons to disagree: -0




      Total Idea Score: 5









      Don't like the score? It is easy to change the score. Just post a reason to agree or disagree with the overall idea, or any of the reasons and the score will change









      Transportation

      As our society becomes more mobile and interconnected, the need for 21st-century transportation networks has never been greater. However, too many of our nation's railways, highways, bridges, airports, and neighborhood streets are slowly decaying due to lack of investment and strategic long-term planning. President Obama and Vice President Biden believe that America's long-term competitiveness depends on the stability of our critical infrastructure. They will make strengthening our transportation systems, including our roads and bridges, a top priority. In the Recovery Act and his first budget proposal, the President made investment in high speed rail a key investment.