Our Platform for Outlining Colorado’s Future

Best reasons to agree : +6 Buildings don't always ruin a place's aesthetic beauty.  We shouldn't build if there is a delicate echo system, but it is OK if the echo system is strong.  It is better to build in beautiful places, so that people can enjoy them, than to build in productive farm land.  People who want to protect our beautiful places for future generations, should not try to keep them as prim-eval forest, but well cared for gardens. They can regulate the heck out of development, and only allow LEED certified, well thought out beautiful buildings. But a place's beauty should not automatically disqualify development, as long as the development is well thought out and managed, and public spaces are preserved for the poor to also enjoy the beauty.  Echo-tourism can be a sustainable way for us to fund wild-life habitat.  Our country needs, and will make money. We have choices. You can't...

Background, context, and assumptions: Cool architecture is functional, sustainable, and attractive. Reasons to agree : +2 The Chicago Architectural Boat Tour is cool  -2. It is hard for an Architectural boat tour to be cool, without cool architecture.  Chicago is where the skyscraper was invited.  Score:  Reasons to agree: +2.  Net total of reasons to agree minus reasons to disagree: -2 Total: 0 Images that agree My mom when she and my dad came to visit on a bridge in Millennium Park.  Background: Me at The Bean, from a 2006 Chicago boat tour, that McDonalds Restaurant Design group took as a team building experience. The image supports this belief because: The bean is cool architecture because it allows you to see yourself in the City. It allows you to reinterprit your surroundings. The bean Related Links: Near Chicago Tourism