Our Platform for Outlining Colorado’s Future: 04/30/11

Apr 30, 2011

There are many similarities between Quetzalcoatl and Jesus Christ

"Teotihuacan arose as a new religious center in the Mexican Highland, around the time of Christ..." Teotihuacan: Introduction". Project Temple of Quetzalcoatl, Instituto Nacional de Antropología e Historia, Mexico/ ASU. 2001-08-20. Retrieved 2009-05-17

Mormons often say that

Welcome to the Future of Collaborative Decision-Making This platform isn’t just a space to share ideas—it’s a step toward a better Colorado. Here, we discuss, refine, and prioritize what truly matters for our state’s future. Your voice matters, and together, we can build a comprehensive and actionable plan that reflects our collective wisdom. But this isn’t just about Colorado. It’s part of a larger movement to revolutionize how debates and decisions happen. Transforming Debate for Inclusive and Impactful Participation Imagine a world where thousands—even millions—contribute meaningfully to critical decisions. By leveraging structured organization, evidence-backed evaluation, and transparent processes, we can transform debates into tools for progress. Join the conversation. Leave your thoughts, share your arguments, and let’s shape a smarter, brighter future together.

There are some aspects of the Book of Mormon that support a literal historical interpretation +0

Reasons to agree: +1

Latter-day Saint President John Taylor was right when he wrote: "Quetzalcoatl and Christ are the same being". The fact that south american cultures believed in a bearded white God named Quetzalcoatl supports the story in the Book of Mormon.

Reasons to disagree: -1

The Bible has enough problems with historical accuracy. If you are going to come along and start a new religion, and say that God has placed his official stamp of approval on this new religion, with new scriptures, the new scriptures should have less problems than the old scriptures, which have been around a long time so that errors of mankind can slip into the things of God... However the Book of Mormon has more archaeological problems than the Bible. There is no city in the Book of Mormon, that you can say existed in then and still exists now... I know, I know, Mormons will say you can't compare the two because the people who lived in cities, and kept written records, according to the Book of Mormon, were all killed off at the end of the Book... But still... we have some archaeology from that time, and it does not compare well to the amount of archaeology that we have to support the rest of Christianity. Right? I'm not an expert, but that is my impression. Is there any way of quantifying this?

Score:

# of reasons to agree: +1

# of reasons to disagree: -1

# of reasons to agree with reasons to agree: +0

# of reasons to agree with reasons to disagree: -0

Total Idea Score: +0

Scriptures that agree: +

Scriptures that disagree: -

Images That agree: +

Images That disagree: -

Valid Interest of those who agree: +

Valid Interest of those who disagree: -

Videos That agree: +

Videos That disagree: -

Website that agree: +

Websites that disagree: -

Podcast that agree: +

Podcast that disagree: -

Unbiased Experts who agree: +

Unbiased Experts who disagree: -

Books that Agree: +

Books that Agree: -

Don't like the score? It is easy to change the score. Just post a reason to agree or disagree with the overall idea, or any of the reasons and the score will change.

Common Interest:

Opposing Interest:

Related arguments:

Myclob