- If our beliefs and arguments were entered into a relational databases, we could:
- tag arguments as either a reason to agree or disagree with a particular belief. This would be beneficial because:
- We could post the results so that reasons to agree or disagree with a conclusion would be on the same webpage.
- It would be beneficial to have all the reasons to agree and disagree with a belief on the same page.
- assign scores to arguments
- assign scores to beliefs, based on the score of the arguments for and against the beliefs
- assign scores to beliefs, based on other beliefs that are used to support or oppose them. For instance the belief that the middle class should get a tax break, has many reasons to agree or disagree with it, and it can also be used as a reasons to support or oppose other beliefs, like the belief that we should support politicians who agree or disagree with a middle class tax cut.
- tag them with intelligent meta data, to allow computers to help organize the argument for us.
Transforming Debate for Inclusive and Impactful Participation Objective: To empower thousands—or even millions—to contribute meaningfully to debates by leveraging structured organization and robust evaluation criteria. Together, we can ensure every voice is heard and every idea is thoughtfully considered.
Dec 12, 2012
If we entered our beliefs and arguments into databases, there are many features of relational databases that could help us come to better conclusions
Labels:
Truth Promotion Algorithm
Welcome to the Future of Collaborative Decision-Making
This platform isn’t just a space to share ideas—it’s a step toward a better Colorado. Here, we discuss, refine, and prioritize what truly matters for our state’s future. Your voice matters, and together, we can build a comprehensive and actionable plan that reflects our collective wisdom.
But this isn’t just about Colorado. It’s part of a larger movement to revolutionize how debates and decisions happen.
Transforming Debate for Inclusive and Impactful Participation
Imagine a world where thousands—even millions—contribute meaningfully to critical decisions. By leveraging structured organization, evidence-backed evaluation, and transparent processes, we can transform debates into tools for progress.
Join the conversation. Leave your thoughts, share your arguments, and let’s shape a smarter, brighter future together.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment