Citizens United has appealed the denial of a preliminary injunction concerning its advertisements for the documentary film Hillary: The Movie (hillarythemovie.com) to the United States Supreme Court . Because the ads qualify as "electioneering communications" under McCain-Feingold, the FEC requires that Citizens United report its donors and put political disclaimers on the ads. Citizens United objects to these regulations because its advertisements are genuine issue ads protected by the First Amendment.
The United States District Court for the District of Columbia denied the requested preliminary injunction to allow Citizens United to run its ads without the McCain-Feingold reporting and disclaimer burdens on January 15. Citizens United filed its notice of appeal on January 16. This morning, the Court received Citizens United's Jurisdictional Statement (asking the Court to set the appeal for full briefing and oral argument) and a motion to expedite the appeal.
The appeal asks the Supreme Court to address three issues: (1) whether as-applied challenges are precluded by the Court's upholding of the disclosure requirements on their face in McConnell v. FEC (2003); (2) whether Congress may regulate as "electioneering communications" ads that the Court in FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life (2007) said were not "electioneering"; and (3) whether the District Court erred in denying the preliminary injunction.
James Bopp, Jr., counsel for Citizens United states: "This case raises substantial issues. First, since the Supreme Court has unanimously rejected the notion that its McConnell decision precluded as-applied challenges to McCain-Feingold, I believe the district court was wrong to assert that McConnell precludes this as-applied challenge to McCain-Feingold. Second, since the Supreme Court said that "electioneering communications" without an "appeal to vote" were not "electioneering," the government has no justification for regulating such non-campaign speech. So Citizens United should have gotten a preliminary injunction. I hope the Supreme Court will agree to full briefing on these substantial issues and decide the case by June."
A copy of the Jurisdictional Statement, along with other case documents, can be found on the website for the James Madison Center for Free Speech at www.jamesmadisoncenter.org .
James Bopp, Jr. has a national constitutional law practice.
Transforming Debate for Inclusive and Impactful Participation Objective: To empower thousands—or even millions—to contribute meaningfully to debates by leveraging structured organization and robust evaluation criteria. Together, we can ensure every voice is heard and every idea is thoughtfully considered.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Featured Post
David's Sling by Marc Stiegler is a Great Book
Home › Topics › Book Analysis › David's Sling David's Sling by Marc Stiegler is a Great Book Current Status: Cult Cl...
Popular Posts
-
This is my mom's mom's life history. Also check out the ongoing projects for my dad , mom , and and dad's mom . Typ...
-
Best reasons to agree : +6 Its hard to understand yourself very well without trying to figure out parents. Your kids will want to know a...
-
Best reasons to agree : +1 The Art Institute of Chicago is bigger, and bigger museums are better. the second largest art museum ...
-
Best Videos that agree : +2 Best reasons to agree : + Kids eat things they should not eat. Kids lick bird poop off slid...
-
Killer whales should not be kept in captivity. Reasons to agree : Over seas zoos are cooler, because they let you have more of ...
-
Background : Before James loved animals, he loved trains. He spoke about them all the time. In particular was a train movie we got from the...
-
Images that agree : Friday Morning Walk around the block. Grandma didn't get as many hugs last time. She is very happy this t...
-
Reasons to agree : +7 Their is little risk of falling off a trampoline if you have netting. Trampolines are no more dangerous than...
-
Best reasons to agree : +6 Buildings don't always ruin a place's aesthetic beauty. We shouldn't build if there is a delicat...
-
Reasons to agree : +7 Young kids will never catch geese. Geese can bight back. They have sharp teeth. Geese are overpopulated. For inst...
No comments:
Post a Comment