Fact Check?

Mickey Kaus and Ramesh Ponuru (who is a McCain supporter) both say that Romney got the immigration position of McCain right in the contrast ad he's aired. Kaus says:
Santora [of the NY Times] has to be wrong. ... [pause for Googling] ... He is. Under McCain's bill, legal immigrants wouldn't collect Social Security "only after they are citizens." They would collect Social Security after they had become legal. In fact, legal immigrants apparently don't even have to become citizens now, under current law--if they're legalized, they can collect Social Security, even for work they performed here when they were illegal.

The distinction between "citizen" and "legal" is important, because it's easier to become a legal worker than it is to "wait" and become a full-fledged citizen. And McCain's "comprehensive immigration reform" would have legalized millions of current illegals fairly quickly. Hence, it would ... how to put it? ... "allow illegals to collect Social Security." Romney's charge seems basically accurate.
Ponuru adds:
I agree with Mickey Kaus that the media fact-checkers in this debate are distorting it more than the actual participants.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You should write the Life History of your Grandmothers Gwendolyn Higbee Matheson (Mom's Mom)

You should write your father's Life History

The Art Institute of Chicago is Better than the Denver Museum of Art

It is worth the effort that caring for animals takes in order to keep them part of our lives -0.5

Trampolines are not too dangerous and are good for kids +2

You should try to convince your kids to not use drugs

My kids enjoy visits from their grandparents

You should go to the Illinois Train Museum in Union IL +2

Its alright to let your young kids chase geese +5

You should keep track of your favorite songs