Distinguishing between personal psychological needs and divine inspiration can be challenging or even impossible.

Alternative ways of saying the same thing:
  1. "It's hard to distinguish personal needs from spiritual experiences."
  2. "Divine feelings might be influenced by personal psychology."

Objective Criteria for Assessing the Validity of this Belief:
  1. Comparative studies of religious experiences, studies on the psychology of belief, personal testimonies.
Unstated assumptions:
Agreement
  1. Assumes psychological factors can explain all spiritual experiences.
Disagreement
  1. Divine experiences are outside of the realm of psychological explanation.


Reasons to agree: +1


  1. People who were raised in the church are going to have good feelings when thinking about staying in the church their parents friends, and family are in. These feelings naturally arise from friends, family, and tradition; independently of the truthfulness of the church. When you add in the confirmation bias, fear of change, and a desire to have answers and purpose in life, it is a wonder that anyone ever leaves. 
  2. +2: Cognitive psychologists argue that emotions and personal needs often influence our beliefs and perceptions, including religious experiences.


Reasons to disagree: -1


  1. Some people (my Grandma included) say they have visions having to do with genealogy, temple work, etc. Many (or some) of these people are good normal, sane, god loving people. Many of the people who joined the church seem to have more than just a small burning in the bosom that can be easily explained by the confirmation bias... And then it can all come back to emotional choice of who you more self identify with...  Who you think is "your" people 
  2. Many religious individuals report experiences that they believe are beyond psychological explanation, such as visions, prophecies, and profound feelings of peace or certainty.





Scriptures that agree: +

  1. In the Bible, 1 Thessalonians 5:21 advises, "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." This could be interpreted as an encouragement to think critically and discern truth.

  2. In the Quran, Surah Al-Baqarah (2:256) says, "There shall be no compulsion in [acceptance of] the religion. The right course has become clear from the wrong." This suggests an emphasis on personal discernment and understanding.

  3. Galations 5:22



Scriptures that disagree: -

  1. In the Bible, 1 Corinthians 2:14 states, "But the natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of God: for they are foolishness unto him: neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned." This suggests that spiritual truths may transcend human logic and understanding and can only be discerned through spiritual means.

  2. In the Bhagavad Gita (10:11), Krishna says, "Out of compassion for them, I, dwelling in their hearts, destroy with the shining lamp of knowledge the darkness born of ignorance." This implies that divine intervention can directly impact human understanding, going beyond personal psychological needs.




Videos That agree: +
  1. "The Invention of Lying" explores a world where religion is presented as a psychological comfort.
  2. "A Beautiful Mind" (2001) - This movie emphasizes the power of reason and intellect, as it follows the life of John Nash, a brilliant mathematician who struggles with schizophrenia.
  3. "Inception" (2010) - In this film, the characters must discern between reality and dreams, illustrating the potential pitfalls of relying too heavily on perception and feelings.

Videos That disagree: -
  1. "The Passion of the Christ" or "The Chosen" present divinely inspired experiences.
  2. "The Tree of Life" (2011) - This film explores spiritual themes and the transcendental experiences of its characters, suggesting a reality that goes beyond our psychological needs and perceptions.
  3. "Contact" (1997) - Although it initially appears to promote reason over emotion, the film ultimately suggests that some experiences can't be fully explained by science or logic.



Website that agree: +
  1. The Secular Web (infidels.org): This website contains numerous articles and essays that critically analyze religious belief, including the reliability of personal spiritual experiences.
  2. Psychology Today (psychologytoday.com): Frequently features articles discussing the psychological underpinnings of spiritual experiences.
  3. Websites like Psychology Today often have articles exploring the psychological aspect of faith.

Websites that disagree: -
  1. Religious websites often have testimonies of divine experiences.
  2. Desiring God (desiringgod.org): Many articles on this site argue for the authenticity of personal spiritual experiences, asserting that these experiences can be genuine encounters with God.
  3. Ligonier Ministries (ligonier.org): This site, grounded in the Reformed tradition, includes teachings that underscore the validity of personal spiritual experiences.

Books that agree: +
  1. Agreement: "The Varieties of Religious Experience" by William James
  2. "You Are Not So Smart" by David McRaney: This book explores various cognitive biases that can interfere with our ability to perceive the truth, including in religious experiences.
  3. "The Invisible Gorilla: How Our Intuitions Deceive Us" by Christopher Chabris and Daniel Simons: This book explores how our intuitions can often mislead us, including in the realm of spiritual experiences.
Books that disagree: -
  1. Disagreement: "The Case for Faith" by Lee Strobel
  2. "The God Who is There" by Francis Schaeffer: Schaeffer argues for the validity of spiritual experiences and the ability of individuals to truly connect with God.
  3. "Knowledge of the Holy" by A.W. Tozer: This book emphasizes the possibility of personal experience with God, asserting that the divine can touch human lives.



Podcast that agree: +
  1. "The Bible for Normal People": Hosted by Peter Enns, a biblical scholar who discusses the complexities and misconceptions about the Bible, including how personal experiences and biases can influence interpretation.
  2. "The Thinking Atheist": Host Seth Andrews often discusses the psychological aspects of religious belief.

Podcast that disagree: -
  1. The Bible for Normal People"
  2. "Unorthodox": This podcast often features stories of personal spiritual experiences, suggesting that these experiences can be genuine encounters with God.
  3. "The Bible Project": This podcast explores themes in the Bible, including the validity of spiritual experiences.

Interest of those that agree: +
Agreement: Secular humanists, atheists, psychologists
Those seeking rational, evidence-based understanding of the world
Interest of those that disagree: +
Religious believers, clergy
Those valuing faith and personal spiritual experiences

  1. Self-Actualization: Regardless of belief, individuals may be pursuing a sense of fulfillment, enlightenment, and personal growth through their understanding and interpretation of personal and spiritual experiences.
  2. Esteem: People on both sides of the argument may be seeking respect from others who share their views, as well as self-respect and confidence in their beliefs.
Opposing Interest:



Unbiased Experts who agree: +
  1. Dr. Michael Shermer: Psychologist, science writer, founder of The Skeptics Society, and editor-in-chief of its magazine Skeptic, which is largely devoted to investigating pseudoscientific and supernatural claims. He often discusses how cognitive biases can affect various aspects of our lives, including religious beliefs.
  2. Dr. Richard Wiseman: A psychologist known for his work on luck, deception, and the science of self-help. His research often includes the field of anomalistic psychology, which attempts to explain paranormal and religious experiences in terms of known psychological and physical factors.

Unbiased Experts who disagree: -
  1. Dr. Andrew Newberg: A neuroscientist who studies religious and spiritual experiences, a field known as neurotheology. His work attempts to understand the nature of religious and spiritual practices and experiences, and does not necessarily assume that they are entirely reducible to psychological factors.
  2. Dr. Ralph Hood Jr.: A psychology professor known for his research on the psychology of religion, particularly in the areas of mystical, conversion, and religious experiences. While his research documents the psychological components of religious experiences, it doesn't necessarily preclude the possibility of genuine spiritual encounters.

Costs of Agreeing: +
  1. Agreement could lead to greater skepticism and less reliance on faith.
  2. Alienation from religious community: Those attributing spiritual feelings solely to psychological needs may feel disconnected from communities that attribute such feelings to divine influence.
  3. Loss of comfort and guidance: The comfort and guidance derived from belief in divine intervention may be lost.
Benefits of Agreeing: -
  1. Encouragement of critical thinking: This perspective encourages critical thinking and skepticism.
  2. Deeper understanding of psychological influences: Recognizing the psychological aspects of spiritual experiences can lead to a deeper understanding of the human mind.
  3. Disagreement could lead to a greater emphasis on personal spiritual experiences.
  4. Cognitive dissonance: Holding spiritual beliefs that contradict one's understanding of psychology can cause cognitive dissonance.
  5. Potential for deception or manipulation: Without considering the psychological influence, one could be more susceptible to deception or manipulation.






# of reasons to agree: +0


# of reasons to disagree: -0


# of reasons to agree with reasons to agree: +0


# of reasons to agree with reasons to disagree: -0


Total Idea Score: 0





Don't like the score? It is easy to change the score. Just post a reason to agree or disagree with the overall idea, or any of the reasons and the score will change.








Related arguments:







Posted by

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)