Our Platform for Outlining Colorado’s Future

Picture this: You're trying to build a house, but there's no blueprint. Workers are swinging hammers at each other instead of nails. Some are measuring in feet, others in meters, and one guy insists on using ancient cubits. The "expert" architects are shouting advice from the parking lot, but nobody's listening because the loudest worker gets all the attention—even though his foundation is completely crooked. This is exactly what public debate looks like in 2025. The Problem: We Have All the Materials, Zero Architecture We're drowning in information, passionate citizens, and platforms to share ideas. But we have no system for organizing these resources into something useful. Instead, we get: The same arguments repeated endlessly across platforms Evidence scattered across thousands of disconnected conversations Misinformation competing equally with rigorous research Debates that reset every news cycle without making progress Expert knowledge ignored ...

MAKE AMERICA GOOD AGAIN America thrives when it leads with values—not deals. But lately, we've flipped that on its head. Everything's a transaction. Integrity, alliances, truth, even leadership—it’s all for sale. And Trump didn’t just walk into that system. He became its poster child. The markets, our retirement accounts, our economy, and people’s jobs are all being held hostage by the chaos he represents. Alliances are crumbling—Europe, Japan, Taiwan, South Korea. Our market is holding its breath. We didn’t earn our global leadership by bullying or cutting the best deal. After WWII, we provided security. We rebuilt Europe and Japan. We showed up with values. And in return, we got trust, alliances—and yes, the reserve currency. That wasn’t charity. It was leadership. And it worked. Today? Trump has ripped that all up. Other countries aren’t just sitting around cheering us on as their economies suffer. They’re not saying, “Go ahead, America! Yay!” No—they’re preparing to m...

In today’s digital age, public discourse resembles a chaotic marketplace—where voices shout over each other, valuable ideas vanish into the void, and every debate seems destined to begin anew. This isn’t just noisy—it’s paralyzing. Enter the Idea Stock Exchange (ISE) , a radical redesign of how we debate, deliberate, and collectively build knowledge. The Crisis of Modern Discourse 1. The Disorder Problem Our debates unfold like a broken game of telephone, fragmented across platforms and lacking any coherent structure. The result? Information overload : Valuable insights drown in noise. Zombie arguments : Weak claims outlive their refutations. Ephemeral insights : Critical counterpoints vanish before they’re heard. Viral over valid : Sensationalism trumps substance. Without structure, public discourse devolves into a Tower of Babel—lots of talk, little progress. 2. The Tabula Rasa Problem Imagine rebuilding the Pyramids from scratch every time someone mentions ancient engineering. That’...

  🧩 How the Idea Stock Exchange Fulfills This 1.  It Treats Beliefs as Public, Networked Objects Every idea you propose gets connected to other beliefs: pro, con, context, and consequence. You’re not forming ideas in a vacuum—you’re  inserting them into the fabric  of shared human knowledge. If your idea contradicts others, the platform helps identify that  contradiction immediately. Every belief is like a puzzle piece—you have to  make it fit  with the rest of the picture, or improve the picture to fit it better. 2.  It Tests Every Idea for Contradiction, Not Just Popularity Most platforms reward attention. The Idea Stock Exchange rewards  coherence . You earn a higher score if: Your belief has strong, well-supported reasons. It holds up  when challenged . It doesn’t contradict already well-supported knowledge. It’s not just: “Can you make a strong argument?” It’s: “Can you make a strong argument that still fits with everything else we...

We’re Running Out of Time to Fix How We Argue Steven Wright’s dark joke hits harder today than ever:  “A conclusion is the place where you get tired of thinking.”  And right now, we’re all exhausted. Our beliefs aren’t built on facts—they’re cobbled together from TikTok clips, rage-bait headlines, and whatever our algorithms decide we’ll click. This isn’t just annoying. It’s dangerous. Democracies are buckling under the weight of arguments that go nowhere. We’re not just divided—we’re operating in different universes of “truth.” If we don’t fix how we disagree, we’ll keep sleepwalking into disasters: climate denial during heatwaves, vaccine hesitancy during pandemics, AI rules written by corporate lobbyists. Why This Is an Emergency We’re arguing wrong Social media turns debates into social wildfires. Outrage spreads faster than truth. We “win” by wearing others down, not by finding answers. We’re running on empty No one has time to fact-check everything. So we outsource ...

Imagine an online community that develops public policy the way Wikipedia develops articles – through open collaboration, evidence, and consensus.  Rationalia Reimagined  is a vision for harnessing collective intelligence to craft better policies. It builds upon astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson’s provocative idea of “Rationalia,” a society with a one-line constitution:  “All policy shall be based on the weight of evidence” ​ thehumanist.com . While Tyson’s concept sparked debate about the role of evidence in governance, Rationalia Reimagined goes beyond his vision to address those critiques and outline a practical model for evidence-based, democratic policymaking. Beyond Tyson’s Vision Tyson’s  Rationalia  proposal in 2016 imagined a virtual nation guided purely by scientific evidence​ thehumanist.com . It was a compelling thought experiment – policymaking driven not by partisanship or ideology, but by facts and data. However, critics quickly pointed out that...

We live in an age of information overload and raging opinion wars, yet genuine understanding is scarce.  Crucial decisions—from personal choices to national policies—too often get made with a one-sided view. We end up talking  at  each other instead of  with  each other. It’s as if everyone is navigating with half a map, missing the full landscape of facts and trade-offs.  It doesn’t have to be this way.  The key to better discourse and wiser decisions is deceptively simple:  map out both sides of every belief. 🚨  Problem:  The Crisis of One‑Sided Thinking Our public dialogue is increasingly polarized and fragmented. People latch onto one side of an issue and cling to it, rarely examining opposing arguments fairly. As a result, Americans on different sides of the spectrum often  “disagree on basic reality”  –  73% of Republicans and Democrats can’t even agree on fundamental facts  about issue ( The Echo Chamber Effec...