Our Platform for Outlining Colorado’s Future

In 2022, as Russian missiles devastated Ukrainian cities, Western companies continued operating in Russia, inadvertently channeling resources into Putin's war machine. This was no anomaly—it starkly illustrates the moral and strategic failures of a global trade system that prioritizes short-term economic gains over democratic values, human rights, and global stability. Whether it’s Western technology enabling China’s surveillance state or oil revenues financing extremism, trade too often empowers authoritarian regimes to undermine justice, freedom, and security. To address these systemic issues, we must fundamentally rethink global trade policy. Import tariffs should be determined by a transparent formula based on objective scores from reputable indices, such as Freedom House’s Freedom in the World report and Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index. This approach would replace politically motivated trade deals with a values-driven framework, rewarding nations th...

Please help me give good parental advice! I'm trying to outline various topics using a formal process to identify reasons to agree/disagree and published documents that agree/disagree in a method that automates cost/benefit analysis and conflict resolution between those who agree and disagree with each belief. Please leave your comments to help me outline this issue. Thesis: It’s important to gather good parental advice Reasons to agree : Dangers of addiction and substance abuse. Evidence: Documented correlation between early intervention and reduced addiction rates Key Example: Impact of alcohol abuse on academic and career trajectories Supporting Research: Studies showing the effectiveness of parent-child communication about substance risks Risk of life-altering relationships and economic pitfalls. Evidence: Statistical data on teen pregnancy and poverty correlation Source: "The Lives of ...

Here’s a complete, polished version that integrates clarity, accurate mathematical representation, and actionable insights for your audience: Belief Score System: Evaluating Arguments This framework introduces a relational database system to evaluate beliefs and conclusions by scoring them based on their supporting and opposing arguments. Users can submit beliefs as reasons to support or oppose other beliefs, creating a hierarchical structure where conclusions depend on the strength of their underlying assumptions. Core Algorithm Equation #1: Conclusion Score ( C S CS ) C S ( C ) = ∑ i ( L S ( A ( C , i ) ) ⋅ B S ( A ( C , i ) ) ) − ∑ j ( L S ( D ( C , j ) ) ⋅ B S ( D ( C , j ) ) ) ∑ i B S ( A ( C , i ) ) + ∑ j B S ( D ( C , j ) ) CS(C) = \frac{\sum_{i} \left( LS(A(C, i)) \cdot BS(A(C, i)) \right) - \sum_{j} \left( LS(D(C, j)) \cdot BS(D(C, j)) \right)}{\sum_{i} BS(A(C, i)) + \sum_{j} BS(D(C, j))} Where: C C : The conclusion being evaluated. A ( C , i ) A(C, i) : The i i -th...

  Issues :  Ending Energy Dependence  / America America has been entangled with foreign oil suppliers for too long. Thesis For too long, America has been entangled with foreign oil suppliers, compromising national ideals, security, and economic stability. Addressing this dependence requires a comprehensive, evidence-based approach to policymaking and public discourse.   Reasons  to agree   Key Reasons to Address Oil Dependence 1. Compromised Ideals Challenge : Pursuing stable oil supplies has led to compromising democratic values and supporting authoritarian regimes. Dynamic Scoring Application : Evaluate historical and current U.S. foreign policy decisions to quantify the trade-offs between oil security and adherence to democratic principles. Use data to visualize these compromises and their consequences. 2. National Security Risks Challenge : Importing oil from unstable regions exposes the U.S. to geopolitical vulnerabilities. Scenario Planning : Simulat...

We must transcend the limitations of broad political identities like "liberal," "progressive," "conservative," "socialist," or "capitalist." These labels often conflate unrelated issues, stalling meaningful progress. Instead, we should focus on automating cost-benefit analysis to systematically and objectively evaluate policies, guiding us toward solutions that truly work. Complex challenges demand nuanced, evidence-driven approaches—not rigid ideological frameworks. What Actually Works? The central question should always be: What will likely yield the best outcomes based on measurable costs and benefits? History teaches us that no "pure" system—whether dominated by large governments, small governments, planned economies, or unregulated free markets—has consistently succeeded under all conditions. What truly matters are the universal principles of governance: reducing corruption, upholding the rule of law, fostering democracy,...

  Summary: This initiative establishes national and state-level expert assemblies where professors elect representatives to advise on government policy within their academic disciplines. The structure is based on the U.S. Congress model.   Structure: National Level: Senate: Two representatives per state for each academic discipline   House: Proportional representation based on each state's academic population     State Level: Representatives advise on state-specific policy   Representatives elected by professors within their field and jurisdiction     Parliamentary procedures for structured debate and recommendations   They wouldn’t have to travel to DC. They could use online collaboration tools to produce joint resolutions and recommendations.     This system creates a comprehensive framework for academic expertise to inform policymaking at all government level...

  Having recently finished The Three-Body Problem series, one key insight struck me: even with godlike technologies, humanity’s propensity for poor collective decisions remains a significant risk. The novels—and the Netflix adaptation—underscore a profound truth: survival and progress are less about the sophistication of our tools and more about our ability to make better collective choices. Scientific and technological advancements alone are insufficient to save us. Without a systematic approach to improving group decision-making, our increasing power might lead us to engineer our own downfall. We need a framework to address this challenge—one that includes public participation and harnesses the wisdom of crowds to mitigate biases. Humanity can confront critical issues threatening our survival by fostering an open, rational, and evidence-based approach to cost-benefit analysis. With the right tools, we can navigate these challenges and, ultimately, position ourselves to thriv...