Our Platform for Outlining Colorado’s Future

Maybe I went a little far in my responses to the journalist below.  However, it looks like WorldNetDaily is goint to be pretty blatantly anti-Romney. Look at the links to the two stories they ran on Jan 2nd.  What a juxtaposition and it solidifies their anti-Romney bias. http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53598 http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53615 Some other stuff they've had up: http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53373 http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=53239 http://worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=52244 "Sexual fascism is alive and well in the People's Republic of Massachusetts, thanks to liberal Republicans. And don't look to Gov. Mitt Romney for help on this. He has yet to take a strong position that affirms traditional marriage or protects our kids against homosexuality." (dated Oct 2006) . . . she must have been living in a hole!!!! ---------- Forwarded message...

Mitt Romney never changed his position on gay marriage.  He has always been against it (in 1994 statements, in 2002, and now).  If his own supporters keep repeating this MSM mantra (lie) then maybe we should just give up hope of combating it?   See below:    http://iowansforromney.blogspot.com/2006_12_01_archive.html   GAY MARRIAGE ISSUE CLARIFICATION: A follow-up piece from today's Globe continued the deception: The Times story follows a Globe story published yesterday that reported that Romney told a Boston-area gay newspaper in 1994 that legalizing gay marriage should be left up to individual states, contrasting with his more recent position that marriage should only occur between men and women and his support of a federal constitutional amendment to ban same-sex marriages. What Romney actually said: On whether he supported the civil marriage rights of same-sex couples: "I line up with Gov. Weld on that, and it's a state issue ...

Governor Mitt Romney is a flip-floper? Reasons to agree Romney changed his position on abortion . Romney changed his position on gay marriage . Reasons to disagree It is not bad to change your position , or change it back. Being called a flip-floper emplies that a politician is lying. There is no evidence that Mitt Romney lies. In fact there is a lot of evidence that he tells the truth, and keeps his commitments. You have to say what positions he has changed, in order to make that assertion. So see my responses (above) to the only two examples I have ever seen, as examples of his flip-floppery. Governor Mitt Romney does not like flip-flopperyness, and has spoken against it . A flip is changing your position. A flip-flop is changing your position, and changing it back. The only example I have ever heard of a Romney's flip-floping was his so-called change on Abortion. So changing your position once, would make Romney a fliper, not a flip-flopper.

We have a problem in America... Republicans only talk to republicans and Democrats only talk to Democrats. We don't want Romney Supporters to only talk to Romney supporters. Go to this site: http://blogsearch.google.com/ Type "Mitt Romney" and correct one lie about Romney a day. Tell me what you find. You will find some good stuff, and some stupid stuff. I want to hear about it all. ~ Mike

Why I vetoed contraception bill By Mitt Romney | July 26, 2005 YESTERDAY I vetoed a bill that the Legislature forwarded to my desk. Though described by its sponsors as a measure relating to contraception, there is more to it than that. The bill does not involve only the prevention of conception: The drug it authorizes would also terminate life after conception. Signing such a measure into law would violate the promise I made to the citizens of Massachusetts when I ran for governor. I pledged that I would not change our abortion laws either to restrict abortion or to facilitate it. What's more, this particular bill does not require parental consent even for young teenagers. It disregards not only the seriousness of abortion but the importance of parental involvement and so would weaken a protection I am committed to uphold. I have spoken with medical professionals to determine whether the drug contemplated under the bill would simply prevent conception or whether it would also ter...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2AE847UXu3Q I did not know someone could comb their hair for that long!

Nathan Moore is a highly respected conservative blogger from Tennessee. He posted this a couple of weeks ago, but I am only reading it now for the first time. Sorry I'm a little late. If you have emotional trauma you might want to get the trial-lawyer, John Edwards, to sue me. Here is the link. http://moorethoughts.com/2006/12/18/massachusetts-governor-in-tennessee/ ~Mike