Obama is wrong on the cap and trade auction system.

Reasons to agree:

  1. Romney has said, "Governor Mark Sanford is right. Unfortunately, some in the Republican Party are embracing the radical environmental ideas of the liberal left. As governor, I found that thoughtful environmentalism need not be anti-growth and anti-jobs. But Kyoto-style sweeping mandates, imposed unilaterally in the United States, would kill jobs, depress growth and shift manufacturing to the dirtiest developing nations."
  2. Its called global warming, but cap and trade only punishes the US, if China and India don't join. We should not put our businesses on an un-even playing field unless other countries go along.
  3. Cap in trade does not work very well in Europe.
  4. It would be better to directly invest in clean technology, instead of punishing old technology.
  5. We should first do a cost benefit analysis of global warming, before we do anything harsh. Lets say we spend 5 trillion dollars every 10 years fighting global warming, but we only stop the planet from changing 1 100th of a degree. Is that success? What if it was 10 or 100 trillion dollars every 10 years? No one is even asking any of these questions. We are just going down the road blindly. Perhaps more lives could be saved with the trillions of dollars this will cost us, if we invested in other things. Who knows, if rising sea levels are the big problems, with that much money we could pump extra water to death valley, and bring some life to a lifeless area. There is still some aspect of the religious cult to the whole carbon-phobia phenomenon that wants to treat the earth like an environmental sanctuary instead of a garden.
  6. Cap and trade would require a lot of regulation, new agencies, tons of overhead.
  7. Emission taxes which they argue are a simple and economically efficient means of achieving the same objective. The fact that Obama approves of the cap and trade auction system shows that he is easily caught up in hype (as well as generating hype) and doesn't look at the facts.
  8. Permit prices may be unstable and therefore unpredictable
  9. Cap and trade systems tend to pass the quota rent to business
  10. Cap and trade systems could become the basis for international trade in the quota rent resulting in very large transfers across frontiers
  11. Cap and trade systems are seen to generate more corruption than a tax system
  12. The administration and legal costs of cap and trade systems are higher than with a tax
  13. A cap and trade system is seen to be impractical at level of individual household emissions

 

Reasons to disagree

  1. We should use the markets to promote good behavior and punish bad behavior.
  2. The transfer of wealth from polluters to non-polluters provides incentives for polluting firms to change.

 

Obama is wrong on the new deal.

Background: In economic affairs, in April 2005, he defended the New Deal social welfare policies of Franklin D. Roosevelt (more)

Reasons to agree:

  1. Central planning never works as well as individual decisions.
  2. The new deal did some good things, but in the long run, it did more damage. The new deal created the welfare state, entitlements, and the retirment of the nany state that will emplode violently with the retirment of the baby-boomers.
  3. Individual people make stupid decisions. The government can try to promote good decisions. But government is run by people, and baby-kissing, phonies who buy elections by telling you what you want to hear, and taking your property and giving it to your neighbor, makes worse decisions than just letting people decide what they want to do with their own money.

Books that agree:

  1. New Deal or Raw Deal?: How FDR's Economic Legacy Has Damaged America (Hardcover) by Burton W., Jr. Folsom

Obama is wrong on the vouchers

Obama is wrong on the vouchers.

Reasons to agree

  1. During an October 2004 debate, Obama stated that he opposed education vouchers for use at private schools because he believes they would undermine public schools. (Keyes, Obama disagree sharply, The Chicago Tribune, October 27, 2004. Archived at the www-news.uchicago.edu website. Retrieved on January 31, 2008).
  2. Obama says vouchers would "would undermine public schools". This is stupid. Schools get a certain amount of money per kid. If schools have less kids, it is only right that they would get less money.

Obama is wrong on government health care









Obama is wrong on government health care.



Reasons to agree:


  1. Obama said; "I am absolutely determined that by the end of the first term of the next president, we should have universal health care in this country."

  2. Why would we want the people who ran the Katrina responce effort, and who run the US Postal service to run healthcare?

Obama is wrong on embryonic stem cell research







Obama is wrong on embryonic stem cell research.



Reasons to agree:


  1. Obama supports embryonic stem cell research and was a co-sponsor of the 2005 Stem Cell Research Enhancement Act. (Statement of Support for Stem Cell Research, Barack Obama, U.S. Senator for Illinois). The government should not take money from people, and use it on things they consider to be murder.



Webpages that agree:


  1. http://www.moralaccountability.com/obama

Obama is wrong on abortion.


Obama is wrong on abortion.

Reasons to agree:

  1. Obama had a 100 percent rating from the Illinois Planned Parenthood Council for his support of abortion rights, family planning services and health insurance coverage for female contraceptives.
  2. Obama voted against requiring medical care for aborted fetuses who survive.
  3. Obama was wrong to have voted against the Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act
  4. Obama is wrong on embryonic stem cell research
  5. Obama voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions. That was bad.
  6. It is pretty messed up for Obama to have voted NO on notifying parents of minors who get out-of-state abortions.
  7. Abortion is wrong.

Reasons to disagree:

  1. OBAMA: If it sounds incredible that I would vote to withhold lifesaving treatment from an infant, that’s because it’s not true. There was a bill that said you have to provide lifesaving treatment. The fact is that there was already a law on the books in Illinois that required providing lifesaving treatment, which is why not only myself but pro-choice Republicans and Democrats voted against it. With respect to partial-birth abortion, I am completely supportive of a ban on late-term abortions, as long as there’s an exception for the mother’s health and life, and this bill did not contain that exception
  2. Obama is right to reach across the isle for common ground on abortion.
  3. People don't care what Obama believes. Issues don't matter with Obama. People like Obama because he is different. but Change for change sake does not solve problems.

One vote that especially riled abortion opponents involved restrictions on a type of abortion where the fetus sometimes survives, occasionally for hours. The restrictions, which never became law, included requiring the presence of a second doctor to care for the fetus.

Abortion opponents see Obama's vote on medical care for aborted fetuses as a refusal to protect the helpless. Some have even accused him of supporting infanticide.

Obama — who joined several other Democrats in voting "present" in 2001 and "no" the next year — argued the legislation was worded in a way that unconstitutionally threatened a woman's right to abortion by defining the fetus as a child.

"It would essentially bar abortions because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this was a child then this would be an anti-abortion statute,"Obama said in the Senate's debate in March 2001.

Obama is wrong on guns.

Obama is wrong on guns

Reasons to agree
  1. Obama supported a ban on the manufacture, sale and possession of handguns (Independent Voters of Illinois Independent Precinct Organization 1996 candidate questionnaire). So Obama thinks that only criminals should have hand guns, because laws are not going to stop them.
  2. Obama voted against a 2004 measure allowing a self-defense exception for people charged with violating local weapons bans by using a gun in their home (Obama Record May Be Gold Mine For Critics CBS News). So you should get in trouple if you protect yourself with a gun, in your own house? So I guess we should all buy base-ball bates, if you live in a bad neighborhood and want to protect yourself.
  3. People would bring guns to my school all the time. I lived in Idaho. It was no big deal. People left their gun in their gun rack in their pick-up-truck, and went shooting for pheasants after school.
  4. An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life. Robert A. Heinlein
Reasons to disagree:
  1. There is little a president could do about guns. We lived through Bill Clinton, we could live through Obama. Having a black president that went to Harvard might inspire enough criminals to go away from a life of crime, it might make up for the loss of safety due to his gun policy.
  1. Hunting as recreation
  2. Hunting as food
  3. Preservation of perceived "manhood".
  4. Preservation of a way of life. They went hunting with their fathers.
  5. Self defense
  1. Reduction of gun violence.

Featured Post

David's Sling by Marc Stiegler is a Great Book

Home › Topics › Book Analysis › David's Sling David's Sling by Marc Stiegler is a Great Book Current Status: Cult Cl...

Popular Posts