Promoting good linkages between assumptions, arguments, and conclusions

There will be slightly different forms for evaluating the different types of argument, because specific questions can be tailored to promote better quality depending on the type of argument being made.

For instance, a photo submitted as a reason to agree or disagree might have different issues that need to be addressed related to exaggeration of political cartoons, or appeal to emotion.

Linkage Scores


The following equation could be used to add more points to valid linkages between assumptions, arguments, and conclusions:


·         LVn:      Number of times someone has verified the logic of a an assumption and conclusion relationship
·         n:         Number of times a verification is removed from a conclusion. A verification of a logical argument that supports a conclusion is an n=1 relationship. A verification of an argument that supports an argument that supports a conclusion is an n=2 relationship
·         LRn:      Logic Reviewer’s score.  See my discussion on giving people scores based on the performance of arguments they support or oppose.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

You should write the Life History of your Grandmothers Gwendolyn Higbee Matheson (Mom's Mom)

You should write your father's Life History

The Art Institute of Chicago is Better than the Denver Museum of Art

It is worth the effort that caring for animals takes in order to keep them part of our lives -0.5

Trampolines are not too dangerous and are good for kids +2

My kids enjoy visits from their grandparents

It is hard work but can be humorous teaching kids manners and hygiene

You should go to the Illinois Train Museum in Union IL +2

Its alright to let your young kids chase geese +5

You should try to convince your kids to not use drugs